In this comment I will go through the logic of the Fujimoto and Opocher (2009) contribution, with the purpose to corroborate the economic interpretation of their notion of 'commodity content' and to clarify how this notion fits in Morishima 'optimum [labour] values'.

Bellino, E., Comment to 'Commodity content ...'' by Fujimoto and Opocher, <<METROECONOMICA>>, 2010; 2010 (61): 749-753. [doi:10.1111/j.1467-999X.2010.04104.x] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/12843]

Comment to 'Commodity content ...'' by Fujimoto and Opocher

Bellino, Enrico
2010

Abstract

In this comment I will go through the logic of the Fujimoto and Opocher (2009) contribution, with the purpose to corroborate the economic interpretation of their notion of 'commodity content' and to clarify how this notion fits in Morishima 'optimum [labour] values'.
Inglese
Bellino, E., Comment to 'Commodity content ...'' by Fujimoto and Opocher, <<METROECONOMICA>>, 2010; 2010 (61): 749-753. [doi:10.1111/j.1467-999X.2010.04104.x] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/12843]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/12843
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact