The present research aims to investigate the psychosocial phenomena of obedience and disobedience in young adults residing in the United States, as a replication of a previous study by Pozzi, Fattori, Bocchiaro, and Alfieri (2014). We utilize social representation theory as a means to better understand and define (dis)obedience, a behavioral dimension of the concept of authority. The analysis was conducted using a concurrent mixed methods design. One hundred and fifty-one participants completed a self-report online questionnaire. The results indicate that participants see both obedience and disobedience as related to an authority. Obedience was mostly perceived as an ability to be responsive to laws, social norms, or physical authorities, as well as a positive social object. Disobedience, instead, was defined as a failure of a negative line of conduct. These results differ from previous research, contributing meaningfully and pragmatically to the theoretical debate on (dis)obedience. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

Pozzi, M., Quartiroli, A., Alfieri, S., Fattori, F., Pistoni, C., (Dis)Obedience in U.S. American Young Adults: A New Way to Describe Authority Relationships, <<EUROPE'S JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY>>, 2018; (14(2)): 404-423. [doi:10.5964/ejop.v14i2.1314] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/122153]

(Dis)Obedience in U.S. American Young Adults: A New Way to Describe Authority Relationships

Pozzi, Maura
;
Quartiroli, Alessandro;Alfieri, Sara;Fattori, Francesco;Pistoni, Carlo
2018

Abstract

The present research aims to investigate the psychosocial phenomena of obedience and disobedience in young adults residing in the United States, as a replication of a previous study by Pozzi, Fattori, Bocchiaro, and Alfieri (2014). We utilize social representation theory as a means to better understand and define (dis)obedience, a behavioral dimension of the concept of authority. The analysis was conducted using a concurrent mixed methods design. One hundred and fifty-one participants completed a self-report online questionnaire. The results indicate that participants see both obedience and disobedience as related to an authority. Obedience was mostly perceived as an ability to be responsive to laws, social norms, or physical authorities, as well as a positive social object. Disobedience, instead, was defined as a failure of a negative line of conduct. These results differ from previous research, contributing meaningfully and pragmatically to the theoretical debate on (dis)obedience. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
2018
AREA11 - SCIENZE STORICHE, FILOSOFICHE, PEDAGOGICHE E PSICOLOGICHE
Saggio in volume collettaneo internazionale o articolo su rivista internazionale
Inglese
Articolo in rivista
Inglese
obedience
disobedience
social representation
cultural comparison
young adults
Italiano
obbedienza
disobbedienza
rappresentazioni sociali
confronto culturale
giovani adulti
Settore M-PSI/05 - PSICOLOGIA SOCIALE
Settore PSIC-03/A - Psicologia sociale
14(2)
2018
Prima edizione elettronica
404
423
20
Esperti anonimi
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Pozzi, M., Quartiroli, A., Alfieri, S., Fattori, F., Pistoni, C., (Dis)Obedience in U.S. American Young Adults: A New Way to Describe Authority Relationships, <<EUROPE'S JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY>>, 2018; (14(2)): 404-423. [doi:10.5964/ejop.v14i2.1314] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/122153]
open
262
Pozzi, Maura; Quartiroli, Alessandro; Alfieri, Sara; Fattori, Francesco; Pistoni, Carlo
5
art_per_29
03. Contributo in rivista::Articolo in rivista, Nota a sentenza
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1314-Article-7974-2-10-20180614.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia file ?: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 283.84 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
283.84 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/122153
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact