Digestive and nutritional alterations are a common occurrence after pancreatic resections. The authors report the results of a multiparametric evaluation performed in a group of 26 patients submitted to total or cephalic pancreatectomy. Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical procedure; group A (n = 13) included gastroresected patients and group B (n = 13) included those submitted to pylorus-sparing pancreatic resection. Subclinical digestive and absorptive impairment has been found in 61.5% of group A patients; the nutritional status was clinically poor in four cases from the same group. Digestive alterations have also been found in 69.2% of group B cases, but nutritional status was always satisfactory in the whole group. The more positive results obtained with the pylorus-sparing technique encourage wider adoption of this procedure.
Crucitti, F., Doglietto, G., Bellantone, R. D. A., Miggiano, G., Frontera, D., Ferrante, A. M. R., Castelli, A., Digestive and nutritional consequences of pancreatic resections. The classical vs the pylorus-sparing procedure, <<INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PANCREATOLOGY>>, 1995; 17 (1): 37-45. [doi:10.1007/BF02788357] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/11944]
Digestive and nutritional consequences of pancreatic resections. The classical vs the pylorus-sparing procedure
Doglietto, Giovanni;Bellantone, Rocco Domenico Alfonso;Ferrante, Angela Maria Rosaria;
1995
Abstract
Digestive and nutritional alterations are a common occurrence after pancreatic resections. The authors report the results of a multiparametric evaluation performed in a group of 26 patients submitted to total or cephalic pancreatectomy. Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical procedure; group A (n = 13) included gastroresected patients and group B (n = 13) included those submitted to pylorus-sparing pancreatic resection. Subclinical digestive and absorptive impairment has been found in 61.5% of group A patients; the nutritional status was clinically poor in four cases from the same group. Digestive alterations have also been found in 69.2% of group B cases, but nutritional status was always satisfactory in the whole group. The more positive results obtained with the pylorus-sparing technique encourage wider adoption of this procedure.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.