This essay suggests a working hypothesis on the extralinguistic dimension of the human voice. The material under consideration belongs both to performance art (Marina Abramović) and to philosophy (Plato). The speech, framed within acontext that would open an archaeological track (E. Melandri, M. Foucault) in theatricality, concerns aesthetics. The voice shows the inner opacity of the ontological discourse: it becomes the empty place, or rather, the quantum vacuum of presence. It is a non-prescriptive voice, excessive of the philosophical practices of taking consciousness, the anticipation of traditional dualisms (subject / object, conscious / unconscious, orality / writing).
Boffi, G., Come fa la voce? Per un'archeologia dell'attore performer, <<MATERIALI DI ESTETICA. TERZA SERIE>>, 2017; (4.1): 37-68 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/116053]
Come fa la voce? Per un'archeologia dell'attore performer
Boffi, Guido
Primo
2017
Abstract
This essay suggests a working hypothesis on the extralinguistic dimension of the human voice. The material under consideration belongs both to performance art (Marina Abramović) and to philosophy (Plato). The speech, framed within acontext that would open an archaeological track (E. Melandri, M. Foucault) in theatricality, concerns aesthetics. The voice shows the inner opacity of the ontological discourse: it becomes the empty place, or rather, the quantum vacuum of presence. It is a non-prescriptive voice, excessive of the philosophical practices of taking consciousness, the anticipation of traditional dualisms (subject / object, conscious / unconscious, orality / writing).I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.