Introduction: A healthy gut microbiota is necessary for the normal operation of several body functions, including gastrointestinal sensitivity and motility, lipid and glucid metabolism, immune surveillance, and host behavior. In addition, intestinal bacteria contribute to determining the pharmacological properties of several drugs by producing different drug metabolizing enzymes. Areas covered: Four enzymatic processes are discussed: prodrug activation; drug inactivation; drug deconjugation; and hydrolysis of natural glycosides with further metabolism of released aglycones. For each of these processes, a literature search has been undertaken on certain paradigmatic examples that have significant clinical implications: aminosalicylates and anthranoid laxatives; digoxin; irinotecan and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); rutin, diosmin, and baicalin. Expert commentary: The modulation of certain reactions catalyzed by gut bacterial enzymes may offer new opportunities to improve the clinical efficacy of drugs such as aminosalicylates, and natural glycosides by increasing their metabolic transformation, and of digoxin by reducing its inactivation, or to decrease the lower intestinal toxicity of irinotecan, and NSAIDs by inhibiting the hydrolytic cleavage of their conjugates. Randomized clinical trials are awaited to clarify whether new intervention strategies may modulate these processes and provide clinical benefits such as improved therapeutic outcomes and drug safety profiles.

Curro', D., The role of gut microbiota in the modulation of drug action: a focus on some clinically significant issues, <<EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY>>, 2018; 11 (2): 171-183. [doi:10.1080/17512433.2018.1414598] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/114813]

The role of gut microbiota in the modulation of drug action: a focus on some clinically significant issues

Curro', Diego
2018

Abstract

Introduction: A healthy gut microbiota is necessary for the normal operation of several body functions, including gastrointestinal sensitivity and motility, lipid and glucid metabolism, immune surveillance, and host behavior. In addition, intestinal bacteria contribute to determining the pharmacological properties of several drugs by producing different drug metabolizing enzymes. Areas covered: Four enzymatic processes are discussed: prodrug activation; drug inactivation; drug deconjugation; and hydrolysis of natural glycosides with further metabolism of released aglycones. For each of these processes, a literature search has been undertaken on certain paradigmatic examples that have significant clinical implications: aminosalicylates and anthranoid laxatives; digoxin; irinotecan and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); rutin, diosmin, and baicalin. Expert commentary: The modulation of certain reactions catalyzed by gut bacterial enzymes may offer new opportunities to improve the clinical efficacy of drugs such as aminosalicylates, and natural glycosides by increasing their metabolic transformation, and of digoxin by reducing its inactivation, or to decrease the lower intestinal toxicity of irinotecan, and NSAIDs by inhibiting the hydrolytic cleavage of their conjugates. Randomized clinical trials are awaited to clarify whether new intervention strategies may modulate these processes and provide clinical benefits such as improved therapeutic outcomes and drug safety profiles.
2018
Inglese
Curro', D., The role of gut microbiota in the modulation of drug action: a focus on some clinically significant issues, <<EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY>>, 2018; 11 (2): 171-183. [doi:10.1080/17512433.2018.1414598] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/114813]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
114813.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia file ?: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 8.16 MB
Formato Unknown
8.16 MB Unknown   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/114813
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 13
  • Scopus 35
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 28
social impact