The potential antineoplastic effect of the long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC n-3 PUFA) eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) remains a highly controversial issue. Numerous animal studies have supported the anticancer role of these dietary fatty acids, whereas conflicting results have been obtained in population studies, and only a few intervention human trials have been so far performed. In view of the possibility that the anticancer effects may be maximally observed within a defined range of EPA and DHA doses, herein we critically review the results and doses used in both animal studies and human clinical trials focusing on the possible n-3 PUFA protective effects against breast and prostate cancer. Our main aim is to identify the EPA and/or DHA ranges of doses needed to obtain clear anticancer effects. This may be of great help in designing future animal studies, and also in understanding the most appropriate dose for further human intervention studies. Moreover, since the healthy effects of these fatty acids have been strictly related to their increased incorporation in plasma and tissue lipids, we also examine and discuss the incorporation changes following the administration of the effective anticancer EPA and/or DHA doses in animals and humans.

Fasano, E., Serini, S., Cittadini, A. R. M., Calviello, G., Long-chain n-3 PUFA against breast and prostate cancer: Which are the appropriatedoses for intervention studies in animals and humans?, <<CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE & NUTRITION>>, 2017; (57): 2245-2262. [doi:10.1080/10408398.2013.850060] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/114319]

Long-chain n-3 PUFA against breast and prostate cancer: Which are the appropriate doses for intervention studies in animals and humans?

Serini, Simona
Secondo
Writing – Review & Editing
;
Cittadini, Achille Renato Maria
Penultimo
Supervision
;
Calviello, Gabriella
Ultimo
Writing – Review & Editing
2017

Abstract

The potential antineoplastic effect of the long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC n-3 PUFA) eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) remains a highly controversial issue. Numerous animal studies have supported the anticancer role of these dietary fatty acids, whereas conflicting results have been obtained in population studies, and only a few intervention human trials have been so far performed. In view of the possibility that the anticancer effects may be maximally observed within a defined range of EPA and DHA doses, herein we critically review the results and doses used in both animal studies and human clinical trials focusing on the possible n-3 PUFA protective effects against breast and prostate cancer. Our main aim is to identify the EPA and/or DHA ranges of doses needed to obtain clear anticancer effects. This may be of great help in designing future animal studies, and also in understanding the most appropriate dose for further human intervention studies. Moreover, since the healthy effects of these fatty acids have been strictly related to their increased incorporation in plasma and tissue lipids, we also examine and discuss the incorporation changes following the administration of the effective anticancer EPA and/or DHA doses in animals and humans.
2017
Inglese
Fasano, E., Serini, S., Cittadini, A. R. M., Calviello, G., Long-chain n-3 PUFA against breast and prostate cancer: Which are the appropriatedoses for intervention studies in animals and humans?, <<CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE & NUTRITION>>, 2017; (57): 2245-2262. [doi:10.1080/10408398.2013.850060] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/114319]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Fasano et al. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr., 2017.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia file ?: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 867.68 kB
Formato Unknown
867.68 kB Unknown   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/114319
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 13
  • Scopus 28
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 23
social impact