Objectives Fluoroquinolone (FQ) prophylaxis was recommended in 2005 by European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL) for patients with prolonged neutropenia. In consideration of a worldwide increase in antibiotic resistance, the issue of FQ prophylaxis during neutropenia was re-evaluated. Methods Literature review of randomised controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies published in years 2006â2014 was performed. Their results were analysed in meta-analysis. Meta-regression model was applied to evaluate whether the rates of FQ resistance in community and hospital settings influenced the efficacy of FQ prophylaxis. The impact of FQ prophylaxis on colonisation and infection with resistant bacteria was reviewed. Results Two RCTs and 12 observational studies were identified. FQ prophylaxis did not have effect on mortality (pooled OR 1.01, 95%CI 0.73â1.41), but was associated with lower rate of bloodstream infections (BSI) (pooled OR 0.57, 95%CI 0.43â0.74) and episodes of fever during neutropenia (pooled OR 0.32, 95%CI 0.20â0.50). No effect of the background rate of FQ resistance on the efficacy of FQ prophylaxis was observed. In few studies, FQ prophylaxis resulted in an increased colonisation or infection with FQ- or multi-drug resistant strains. Conclusions The possible benefits of FQ prophylaxis on BSI rate, but not on overall mortality, should be weighed against its impact in terms of toxicity and changes in local ecology in single centres.
Mikulska, M., Averbuch, D., Tissot, F., Cordonnier, C., Akova, M., Calandra, T., Ceppi, M., Bruzzi, P., Viscoli, C., Akova, M., Aljurf, M., Averbuch, D., Barnes, R., Blennow, O., Bochud, P., Bouza, E., Bretagne, S., Brã¼ggemann, R., Calandra, T., Carratala, J., Cesaro, S., Cordonnier, C., Cornely, O., Dalianis, T., De La Camara, R., Donnelly, P., Drgona, L., Duarte, R., Einsele, H., Engelhard, D., Fox, C., Girmenia, C., Groll, A., Heldal, D., Larsen, J. H., Herbrecht, R., Hirsch, H., Johnson, E., Klyasova, G., Koskuenvo, M., Lagrou, K., Lewis, R. E., Ljungman, P., Maertens, J., Maschmeyer, G., Mikulska, M., Nucci, M., Padoin, C., Pagano, L., Pagliuca, A., Racil, Z., Ribaud, P., Rinaldo, C., Puechal, V. R., Roilides, E., Robin, C., Rovira, M., Rupp, M., Sanchez, S., Schellongowski, P., Sedlacek, P., Sinko, J., Slavin, M., Ferreira, I. S., Styczynski, J., Tissot, F., Viscoli, C., Ward, K., Witschi, A., Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in haematological cancer patients with neutropenia: ECIL critical appraisal of previous guidelines, <<JOURNAL OF INFECTION>>, 2018; 76 (1): 20-37. [doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2017.10.009] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/110124]
Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in haematological cancer patients with neutropenia: ECIL critical appraisal of previous guidelines
Pagano, Livio;
2018
Abstract
Objectives Fluoroquinolone (FQ) prophylaxis was recommended in 2005 by European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL) for patients with prolonged neutropenia. In consideration of a worldwide increase in antibiotic resistance, the issue of FQ prophylaxis during neutropenia was re-evaluated. Methods Literature review of randomised controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies published in years 2006â2014 was performed. Their results were analysed in meta-analysis. Meta-regression model was applied to evaluate whether the rates of FQ resistance in community and hospital settings influenced the efficacy of FQ prophylaxis. The impact of FQ prophylaxis on colonisation and infection with resistant bacteria was reviewed. Results Two RCTs and 12 observational studies were identified. FQ prophylaxis did not have effect on mortality (pooled OR 1.01, 95%CI 0.73â1.41), but was associated with lower rate of bloodstream infections (BSI) (pooled OR 0.57, 95%CI 0.43â0.74) and episodes of fever during neutropenia (pooled OR 0.32, 95%CI 0.20â0.50). No effect of the background rate of FQ resistance on the efficacy of FQ prophylaxis was observed. In few studies, FQ prophylaxis resulted in an increased colonisation or infection with FQ- or multi-drug resistant strains. Conclusions The possible benefits of FQ prophylaxis on BSI rate, but not on overall mortality, should be weighed against its impact in terms of toxicity and changes in local ecology in single centres.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
