In this study, we seek to widen our understanding of the developmental processes underlying bargaining behaviour in children addressing the concept of prospective thinking. We argue that the emergence of the capacity to think prospectively about future outcomes or behaviours in response to current actions is a required precedent to strategic decision making. To test this idea, we compared 6, 8 and 10 years old children’s performance on three tasks: the ultimatum game assessing fairness/inequality aversion, the marshmallow task, an intertemporal choice task evaluating the ability to delay gratification, and the dictator game assessing altruism. The children’s socio-demographic and cognitive variables were also evaluated. We hypothesized that development of strategic thinking in the ultimatum game is related to an increased ability to delay gratification − given that both tasks require looking at prospective benefits − and, crucially, not to altruism, which benefits from immediate selfless reward. Our results confirmed our hypothesis suggesting that increased strategic planning with age would also stem from the development of competencies like prospective thinking.

Lombardi, E., Di Dio, C., Castelli, I., Massaro, D., Marchetti, A., Prospective thinking and decision making in primary school age children, <<HELIYON>>, 2017; 3 (6): e00323-N/A. [doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00323] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/105443]

Prospective thinking and decision making in primary school age children

Lombardi, Elisabetta
Primo
;
Di Dio, Cinzia
Secondo
;
Castelli, Ilaria;Massaro, Davide
Penultimo
;
Marchetti, Antonella
Ultimo
2017

Abstract

In this study, we seek to widen our understanding of the developmental processes underlying bargaining behaviour in children addressing the concept of prospective thinking. We argue that the emergence of the capacity to think prospectively about future outcomes or behaviours in response to current actions is a required precedent to strategic decision making. To test this idea, we compared 6, 8 and 10 years old children’s performance on three tasks: the ultimatum game assessing fairness/inequality aversion, the marshmallow task, an intertemporal choice task evaluating the ability to delay gratification, and the dictator game assessing altruism. The children’s socio-demographic and cognitive variables were also evaluated. We hypothesized that development of strategic thinking in the ultimatum game is related to an increased ability to delay gratification − given that both tasks require looking at prospective benefits − and, crucially, not to altruism, which benefits from immediate selfless reward. Our results confirmed our hypothesis suggesting that increased strategic planning with age would also stem from the development of competencies like prospective thinking.
Inglese
Lombardi, E., Di Dio, C., Castelli, I., Massaro, D., Marchetti, A., Prospective thinking and decision making in primary school age children, <<HELIYON>>, 2017; 3 (6): e00323-N/A. [doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00323] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/105443]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2017_Lombardi et al_2017_heliyon.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia file ?: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 430.92 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
430.92 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/10807/105443
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact