Aim: Aim of this study was to compare the removal of smear layer and organic debris within the tooth canal among conventional needle irrigation, EndoVac and Endoactivator. Methodology: Eighty single-rooted extracted human teeth were prepared with rotary NiTi instrumentation and randomly separated into 4 groups. Twenty teeth were used as positive control (Group 1), irrigated with only saline. Teeth assigned to Group 2 (n = 20) received irrigation with a conventional syringe and a 30-gauge needle (NaviTip, Ultradent, South Jordan, UT);
Castagnola, R., Lajolo, C., Minciacchi, I., Cretella, G., Foti, R., Marigo, L., Gambarini, G., Angerame, D., Somma, F., Efficacy of three different irrigation techniques in the removal of smear layer and organic debris from root canal wall: A scanning electron microscope study, <<GIORNALE ITALIANO DI ENDODONZIA>>, 2014; 28 (2): 79-86. [doi:10.1016/j.gien.2014.09.001] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/102087]
Efficacy of three different irrigation techniques in the removal of smear layer and organic debris from root canal wall: A scanning electron microscope study
Castagnola, Raffaella
;Lajolo, CarloSecondo
;Minciacchi, Irene;Cretella, Gilda;Foti, Roberta;Marigo, Luca;Somma, FrancescoUltimo
2014
Abstract
Aim: Aim of this study was to compare the removal of smear layer and organic debris within the tooth canal among conventional needle irrigation, EndoVac and Endoactivator. Methodology: Eighty single-rooted extracted human teeth were prepared with rotary NiTi instrumentation and randomly separated into 4 groups. Twenty teeth were used as positive control (Group 1), irrigated with only saline. Teeth assigned to Group 2 (n = 20) received irrigation with a conventional syringe and a 30-gauge needle (NaviTip, Ultradent, South Jordan, UT);
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
