The purpose of the contribution is twofold. First, it seeks to highlight this “flexibility” (i.e. the scope of the departures from the OECD Model and its Commentary) by means of broad statistical analyses on the reservations and observations recorded by the OECD member countries, as well as to investigate the possible causes and the (legal) effects thereof. Second, in light of this analysis, this contribution briefly explores the issues arising from the existence of observations and reservations.
Arginelli, P., Dirkis, M., Revisiting and Reviewing “Reservations”, “Observations” and “Positions” to the OECD Model – Selected Provisions: OECD Member Countries, in Maisto, G. (ed.), Departures from the OECD Model and Commentaries, IBFD, Amsterdam 2014: 135- 184 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/63389]
Revisiting and Reviewing “Reservations”, “Observations” and “Positions” to the OECD Model – Selected Provisions: OECD Member Countries
Arginelli, Paolo;
2014
Abstract
The purpose of the contribution is twofold. First, it seeks to highlight this “flexibility” (i.e. the scope of the departures from the OECD Model and its Commentary) by means of broad statistical analyses on the reservations and observations recorded by the OECD member countries, as well as to investigate the possible causes and the (legal) effects thereof. Second, in light of this analysis, this contribution briefly explores the issues arising from the existence of observations and reservations.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
