At first sight, the philosophy of dialogue appears to propose an ethics which is shared by all the thinkers of this tradition, with certain words being decisive for precisely understanding the exact ground in which this ethics is developed. In a certain sense this is true: there is no doubt that there exists a group of common words which are in shared use by the di¬verse exponents of the philosophy of dialogue –I, thou, dialogue, rap¬port, relation, responsibility, the other, ethics. However, upon looking more closely two things immediately become obvious. First of all, each of the philosophers of dialogue emphasizes a particular word amongst those he shares with the others. In the begin¬ning, at least, Martin Buber highlighted “relation” as both the primary word and as providing a reciprocal rapport between “I” and “Thou”. Gabriel Marcel, conversely, brings mystery, the body and the other to the forefront. Lévinas emphasizes how responsibility for the other is recog¬nized. None of these words are rejected or placed on a secondary level, even though, for each individual exponent of the philosophy of dialogue, their particular privileged word gradually develops into a kind of quasi-religious icon which is able, just like a sacred image, to draw the gaze and inspire reflection.

La filosofia del dialogo sembra proporre a prima vista un’etica condivisa dai suoi protagonisti e dove alcune parole sono decisive per riconoscere in modo preciso il terreno su cui ci si trova esattamente. In un certo senso è per davvero così. Non c’è dubbio che esista un gruppo di parole comuni e trasversali rispetto ai diversi esponenti della filosofia del dialogo: l’io, il tu, il dialogo, il rapporto, la relazione, la responsabilità, l’altro, l’etica. Guardando però più da vicino si notano immediatamente due cose. Anzitutto che ciascuno dei filosofi del dialogo dà particolare risalto a qualcuna delle parole condivise con gli altri. Almeno all’inizio Martin Buber sottolinea la relazione come prima parola e come rapporto di reciprocità tra l’Io e il Tu. Gabriel Marcel porta in evidenza il mistero, il corpo, l’altro. Lévinas enfatizza com’è noto la responsabilità per altri. Nessuna parola è rifiutata o messa in second’ordine, eppure quella privilegiata diventa piano piano per ogni singolo esponente della filosofia del dialogo una specie di icona quasi religiosa capace di catalizzare come un’immagine sacra lo sguardo e la riflessione.

Riva, F., The decision for the word: Buber, Marcel and Lévinas, in Urabayen, J., Sanchez-Migallon, S. (ed.), Reflection on Morality in Contemporary Philosophy. Performing and Ongoing Phenomenology, OLMS, Hildesheim Zurigo New York 2014: <<Reason and Normativity>>, 221- 253 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/53394]

The decision for the word: Buber, Marcel and Lévinas

Riva, Franco
2014

Abstract

At first sight, the philosophy of dialogue appears to propose an ethics which is shared by all the thinkers of this tradition, with certain words being decisive for precisely understanding the exact ground in which this ethics is developed. In a certain sense this is true: there is no doubt that there exists a group of common words which are in shared use by the di¬verse exponents of the philosophy of dialogue –I, thou, dialogue, rap¬port, relation, responsibility, the other, ethics. However, upon looking more closely two things immediately become obvious. First of all, each of the philosophers of dialogue emphasizes a particular word amongst those he shares with the others. In the begin¬ning, at least, Martin Buber highlighted “relation” as both the primary word and as providing a reciprocal rapport between “I” and “Thou”. Gabriel Marcel, conversely, brings mystery, the body and the other to the forefront. Lévinas emphasizes how responsibility for the other is recog¬nized. None of these words are rejected or placed on a secondary level, even though, for each individual exponent of the philosophy of dialogue, their particular privileged word gradually develops into a kind of quasi-religious icon which is able, just like a sacred image, to draw the gaze and inspire reflection.
2014
Inglese
Reflection on Morality in Contemporary Philosophy. Performing and Ongoing Phenomenology
978-3-487-15105-2
Ricerca Internazionale con sede estera
Riva, F., The decision for the word: Buber, Marcel and Lévinas, in Urabayen, J., Sanchez-Migallon, S. (ed.), Reflection on Morality in Contemporary Philosophy. Performing and Ongoing Phenomenology, OLMS, Hildesheim Zurigo New York 2014: <<Reason and Normativity>>, 221- 253 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/53394]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/53394
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact