This paper considers three passages of Aristotle’s Politics which mention nomophylakia and nomophylakes. Although we cannot clear up the historical and institutional context (surely not only Athenian) which inspires Aristotle’s remarks, the nomophylakia seems to be an “aristocratic” institution, a sort of constitutional corrective which intends, on the one hand, to defend nomos and politeia from abuses by individuals and masses/groups, and, on the other hand, to ensure respect of nomos by magistrates and citizens. Furthermore, Aristotle’s treatment of nomophylakia and nomophylakes leads to challenge the hypothesis that the Athenian nomophylakes were established by Ephialtes, as Jacoby thought and as it has been recently reproposed by O’Sullivan.
Bearzot, C. S., Nomophylakes e nomophylakia nella Politica di Aristotele, in Polito, M., Talamo, C. (ed.), Istituzioni e costituzioni in Aristotele tra storiografia e pensiero politico, TORED, Tivoli 2012: <<Themata 10>>, 29- 47 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/42033]
Nomophylakes e nomophylakia nella Politica di Aristotele
Bearzot, Cinzia Susanna
2012
Abstract
This paper considers three passages of Aristotle’s Politics which mention nomophylakia and nomophylakes. Although we cannot clear up the historical and institutional context (surely not only Athenian) which inspires Aristotle’s remarks, the nomophylakia seems to be an “aristocratic” institution, a sort of constitutional corrective which intends, on the one hand, to defend nomos and politeia from abuses by individuals and masses/groups, and, on the other hand, to ensure respect of nomos by magistrates and citizens. Furthermore, Aristotle’s treatment of nomophylakia and nomophylakes leads to challenge the hypothesis that the Athenian nomophylakes were established by Ephialtes, as Jacoby thought and as it has been recently reproposed by O’Sullivan.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.