The paper begins with the discussion of De anima, III, 11, 434a7-10:unlike the best known interpretations of the passage, which considerably depend on Philoponus’ commentary, the A. tries to reconstruct the activity of measurement, presented in analogy with the “deliberative imagination”, in the light of procedures of decomposition and recomposition of geometrical figures, which were widely spread in the V-IV centuries B.C., of which numismatic illustrations are also offered. It is possible to understand in the same line the reference both to the “analysis” of figures in Nichomachean Ethics, III, 5, 1112b20-21, and to the triangle as an “extreme” in Nichomachean Ethics, VI, 9, 1142a23. To this spatial-metretic model of the phantasia bouleutikē, a logistic-temporal one is added, mentioned in De anima, III, 7, 431b7-8 and De memoria, 2, 453a15-16, with an interesting confirmation in Thucydides, I, 138, 3, where Themistocles is compared to a “skillfull gnōmōn”. In both cases, the mathematical models that serve as inspiration to the man that imagines while trying to understand what is to act well, here and now, are not refined products of theoretical sciences, but part of those “merchants’ mathematics” which Plato advised not to practice in order to gain the vision of the true good.

Cattanei, E., L’immaginario geometrico dell’uomo che delibera. Schemi di esercizio della "phantasia bouleutiké" in Aristotele, in A. Ferman, A. F., M. Miglior, M. M. (ed.), Attività e virtù. Anima e corpo in Aristotele, Vita e pensiero, MILANO 2009: 83- 112 [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/336819]

L’immaginario geometrico dell’uomo che delibera. Schemi di esercizio della "phantasia bouleutiké" in Aristotele

Cattanei, Elisabetta
2009

Abstract

The paper begins with the discussion of De anima, III, 11, 434a7-10:unlike the best known interpretations of the passage, which considerably depend on Philoponus’ commentary, the A. tries to reconstruct the activity of measurement, presented in analogy with the “deliberative imagination”, in the light of procedures of decomposition and recomposition of geometrical figures, which were widely spread in the V-IV centuries B.C., of which numismatic illustrations are also offered. It is possible to understand in the same line the reference both to the “analysis” of figures in Nichomachean Ethics, III, 5, 1112b20-21, and to the triangle as an “extreme” in Nichomachean Ethics, VI, 9, 1142a23. To this spatial-metretic model of the phantasia bouleutikē, a logistic-temporal one is added, mentioned in De anima, III, 7, 431b7-8 and De memoria, 2, 453a15-16, with an interesting confirmation in Thucydides, I, 138, 3, where Themistocles is compared to a “skillfull gnōmōn”. In both cases, the mathematical models that serve as inspiration to the man that imagines while trying to understand what is to act well, here and now, are not refined products of theoretical sciences, but part of those “merchants’ mathematics” which Plato advised not to practice in order to gain the vision of the true good.
2009
Italiano
Attività e virtù. Anima e corpo in Aristotele
978-88-343-1548-4
Vita e pensiero
Cattanei, E., L’immaginario geometrico dell’uomo che delibera. Schemi di esercizio della "phantasia bouleutiké" in Aristotele, in A. Ferman, A. F., M. Miglior, M. M. (ed.), Attività e virtù. Anima e corpo in Aristotele, Vita e pensiero, MILANO 2009: 83- 112 [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/336819]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/336819
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact