This chapter examines contemporary Chinese medical dramas from 2016 to 2025 as a genre shaped by the interaction of entertainment, state ideology, and pedagogical aims. Drawing on qualitative narrative analysis of 11 series, production and funding data, and illustrative reception data from Douban, the authors argue that these dramas function simultaneously as popular entertainment, health communication, and a managed space for limited social critique. The chapter identifies two main analytical dimensions. First, it shows how genre hybridity, rapid tonal shifts, and the emergence of Covid-focused dramas allow medical series to combine propaganda with controlled representations of healthcare tensions, including institutional failures, doctor-patient conflict, and public anxiety. These dramas can acknowledge problems, but they usually resolve them through moral heroism, family solidarity, and reaffirmation of state responsiveness rather than structural reform. Second, the chapter analyzes how medical dramas contribute to the construction of cultural-national identity. It highlights the growing legitimation of Traditional Chinese Medicine, the broader “sinicization” of medical knowledge, and the reinforcement of conservative gender and family norms aligned with contemporary state priorities. At the same time, audience responses reveal skepticism toward the mystification of TCM and resistance to regressive gender portrayals, showing that the genre remains a contested but tightly managed arena of public discourse.

Tarantino, M., Amadori, G., Contemporary Chinese Medical Drama and Public Discourse: Main Dimensions, in Pescatore, G. . M. S. (ed.), The world of medical drama. Television, healthcare and society in a global perspective, Vita e Pensiero, Milano 2026: 89- 104 [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/336305]

Contemporary Chinese Medical Drama and Public Discourse: Main Dimensions

Tarantino, Matteo;Amadori, Gaia
2026

Abstract

This chapter examines contemporary Chinese medical dramas from 2016 to 2025 as a genre shaped by the interaction of entertainment, state ideology, and pedagogical aims. Drawing on qualitative narrative analysis of 11 series, production and funding data, and illustrative reception data from Douban, the authors argue that these dramas function simultaneously as popular entertainment, health communication, and a managed space for limited social critique. The chapter identifies two main analytical dimensions. First, it shows how genre hybridity, rapid tonal shifts, and the emergence of Covid-focused dramas allow medical series to combine propaganda with controlled representations of healthcare tensions, including institutional failures, doctor-patient conflict, and public anxiety. These dramas can acknowledge problems, but they usually resolve them through moral heroism, family solidarity, and reaffirmation of state responsiveness rather than structural reform. Second, the chapter analyzes how medical dramas contribute to the construction of cultural-national identity. It highlights the growing legitimation of Traditional Chinese Medicine, the broader “sinicization” of medical knowledge, and the reinforcement of conservative gender and family norms aligned with contemporary state priorities. At the same time, audience responses reveal skepticism toward the mystification of TCM and resistance to regressive gender portrayals, showing that the genre remains a contested but tightly managed arena of public discourse.
2026
Inglese
The world of medical drama. Television, healthcare and society in a global perspective
9788834360699
Vita e Pensiero
Tarantino, M., Amadori, G., Contemporary Chinese Medical Drama and Public Discourse: Main Dimensions, in Pescatore, G. . M. S. (ed.), The world of medical drama. Television, healthcare and society in a global perspective, Vita e Pensiero, Milano 2026: 89- 104 [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/336305]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/336305
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact