Why do populist parties with an anti-immigrant stance have success in areas that host few immigrants? We use data from a sample of Italian municipalities to show that the relationship between the vote shares of anti-immigration parties and the share of immigrants follows a U-shaped curve, which exhibits a tipping-like behavior around a share of immigrants equal to 3.35 %. We estimate that the vote share of Lega Nord, the main Italian anti-immigration party, is approximately 6 % points higher for municipalities below the threshold. We show that the competition in the labor market between low-skilled natives and immigrants is the more plausible explanation for the electoral success of anti-immigration parties in areas with low immigrant shares. We rationalize our findings with a simple theoretical model and show that alternative stories are not supported by the data. Finally, we discuss the policy implications and suggest how immigration and labor market policies could reduce anti-immigration sentiment.

Bordignon, M., Gamalerio, M., Slerca, E., Turati, G., Per una migliore integrazione, Vita e Pensiero Pubblic University:Largo Gemelli 1, I 20123 Milan Italy:011 39 02 72342310, 011 39 2 72342370, EMAIL: [email protected], Fax: 011 39 02 72342974, MILANO -- ITA 2022: 22 [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/335537]

Per una migliore integrazione

Bordignon, Massimo;Turati, Gilberto
2022

Abstract

Why do populist parties with an anti-immigrant stance have success in areas that host few immigrants? We use data from a sample of Italian municipalities to show that the relationship between the vote shares of anti-immigration parties and the share of immigrants follows a U-shaped curve, which exhibits a tipping-like behavior around a share of immigrants equal to 3.35 %. We estimate that the vote share of Lega Nord, the main Italian anti-immigration party, is approximately 6 % points higher for municipalities below the threshold. We show that the competition in the labor market between low-skilled natives and immigrants is the more plausible explanation for the electoral success of anti-immigration parties in areas with low immigrant shares. We rationalize our findings with a simple theoretical model and show that alternative stories are not supported by the data. Finally, we discuss the policy implications and suggest how immigration and labor market policies could reduce anti-immigration sentiment.
2022
Italiano
Monografia o trattato scientifico
978-88-343-5276-2
Vita e Pensiero Pubblic University:Largo Gemelli 1, I 20123 Milan Italy:011 39 02 72342310, 011 39 2 72342370, EMAIL: [email protected], Fax: 011 39 02 72342974
Bordignon, M., Gamalerio, M., Slerca, E., Turati, G., Per una migliore integrazione, Vita e Pensiero Pubblic University:Largo Gemelli 1, I 20123 Milan Italy:011 39 02 72342310, 011 39 2 72342370, EMAIL: [email protected], Fax: 011 39 02 72342974, MILANO -- ITA 2022: 22 [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/335537]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/335537
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact