The writing of social work reports represents a significant activity in the helping practice of social workers, not only in terms of time (Cabiati, 2015; Lillis et al., 2020), but above all in terms of the impact this activity has on the lives of people who turn to social services (Roose et al., 2009; McDonald et al., 2015). National and international literature on social work writing focuses on technical skills in terms of content organization, clarity, conciseness, and accuracy—particularly in reference manuals (Ricucci, 2009; Quaglia, 2010; Bini, 2018; Healy & Mulholland, 2019; Rai, 2021; Gagliardi, 2022)—as well as on pedagogical aspects of social work education (Alter & Adkins, 2001, 2006; Grise-Owens & Crum, 2012; Nelson & Weatherald, 2014; Houston & McColgan, 2014; Nkateng & Wharton, 2015; Thomas et al., 2016). Writing, on the other hand, is an opportunity to put into practice the discretionary nature of social work and carries important ethical as well as methodological implications (Carney & Koncel, 1994; Taylor, 2008). Reflections from Critical Anti-Oppressive Social Work (Dominelli, 2002; Dalrymple & Burke, 2006; Thompson, 2016; Sanfelici, 2024)—with a postmodern constructionist perspective (Fook, 2016; Healy, 2014)—and from Relational Social Work (Donati, 1991; Folgheraiter, 1998, 2011) help us recognize written text as a powerful vehicle for “discourses” and “narratives” (Parton & O’Byrne, 2000; Taylor & White, 2000), and as a potential helping tool in terms of recognition, empowerment, and participation (Roose et al., 2009; Krumer-Nevo & Sidi, 2012a, 2012b; Humphreys & Kertesz, 2013; Weiss-Gal et al., 2014; Roets et al., 2015, 2017; Krumer-Nevo, 2020; Raineri & Landi, 2023). The doctoral dissertation presented here illustrates the research conducted between 2021 and 2023 in Italy, using a qualitative approach within the framework of Practice Research (Uggerhøj, 2011). Through online focus groups, document analysis, and a Community of Practice (Wenger, 1998), the research involved 49 social workers and collected 33 reports to understand how writing, as a professional practice, fits into the social work helping relationship. The aim of the research was to explore the emancipatory intent of social work within the professional practice of report writing by social workers. Drawing on both data-driven and theory-driven analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006), the dissertation offers reflections on the characteristics of reports written by social workers, as well as on practitioners’ experiences and opinions on the topic. It also presents a deeper examination of the concept of power in the professional writing process, connected to the dynamics of representation and narration of life stories, and to the potentially oppressive yet simultaneously emancipatory nature of social work texts for people who turn to services. Finally, attention is drawn to levels of participation in writing processes, offering an opportunity to explore the identity of professional writing in social work.
La scrittura di relazioni sociali (report) rappresenta un'attività significativa nella pratica professionale di aiuto dell'assistente sociale, non solamente in termini di tempo (Cabiati, 2015; Lillis et al., 2020), ma soprattutto in termini di impatto che questa attività ha sulla vita delle persone che si rivolgono ai servizi sociali (Roose et. al., 2009; McDonald et. al., 2015). La letteratura nazionale e internazionale sul tema della scrittura di servizio sociale focalizza l'attenzione sulle competenze tecniche in termini di organizzazione dei contenuti, chiarezza espositiva, sinteticità, accuratezza - in particolare nella manualistica di riferimento (Ricucci, 2009; Quaglia, 2010; Bini, 2018; Healy & Mulholland, 2019; Rai, 2021; Gagliardi, 2022) - e sugli aspetti pedagogici di social work education (Alter e Adkins, 2001, 2006; Grise-Owens e Crum, 2012; Nelson e Weatherald, 2014; Houston e McColgan, 2014; Nkateng & Wharton, 2015; Thomas et. al., 2016). La scrittura d'altra parte è un'occasione di messa in campo della discrezionalità tipica del lavoro sociale e ha importanti implicazioni etiche, oltre che metodologiche (Carney and Koncel 1994; Taylor, 2008). Le riflessioni del Critical Anti-Oppressive Social Work (Dominelli 2002; Dalrymple e Burke, 2006; Thompson, 2016; Sanfelici, 2024) - con una prospettiva costruzionista post-moderna (Fook, 2016; Healy, 2014) - e del Relational Social Work (Donati, 1991; Folgheraiter, 1998; 2011), ci aiutano a riconoscere il testo scritto come un potente veicolo di "discorsi" e "narrazioni" (Parton & O’Byrne, 2000; Taylor e White, 2000) e come un potenziale strumento d'aiuto in termini di riconoscimento, empowerment e partecipazione (Roose et. al., 2009; Krumer-Nevo e Sidi, 2012a, 2012b; Humpreys e Kertesz, 2013; Weiss-Gal et. al., 2014; Roets et. al. 2015, 2017; Krumer-Nevo, 2020; Raineri e Landi, 2023). La tesi dottorale qui presentata illustra il lavoro di ricerca condotto, negli anni 2021 – 2023 in Italia, secondo un approccio qualitativo nell'ambito di una Practice Research (Uggerhøj, 2011). Attraverso lo strumento del Focus Group online, dell'analisi documentaria e della Community of Practice (Wenger, 1998), la ricerca ha coinvolto 49 assistenti sociali e raccolto 33 report per comprendere come la scrittura, in quanto pratica professionale, si inserisce nella relazione di aiuto di servizio sociale. La ricerca ha avuto come finalità l'esplorazione dell'intento emancipatorio del lavoro sociale nella pratica professionale di scrittura di report da parte di assistenti sociali. A partire da un'analisi data-driven e theory-driven (Braun & Clarke, 2006), nella tesi dottorale vengono proposte riflessioni in merito alle caratteristiche dei report scritti da assistenti sociali e ai vissuti e le opinioni dei professionisti sul tema. Inoltre viene presentato un approfondimento sul concetto di potere nella pratica professionale di scrittura connesso alle dinamiche di rappresentazione e narrazione delle storie di vita e sulle potenzialità oppressive e al contempo emancipatorie dei testi di servizio sociale per le persone che si rivolgono ai servizi. L'attenzione viene portata infine sui livelli di partecipazione nei processi di scrittura, offrendo l'opportunità di approfondire il tema dell'identità della scrittura professionale di servizio sociale.
Masciocchi, Sofia, LE RELAZIONI SCRITTE DEGLI ASSISTENTI SOCIALI: DINAMICHE DI RAPPRESENTAZIONE E INTENTO EMANCIPATORIO. UNA RICERCA QUALITATIVA CON LA TECNICA COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE, Raineri, Maria Luisa, Gomarasca, Paolo, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore MILANO:Ciclo XXXVI [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/328961]
LE RELAZIONI SCRITTE DEGLI ASSISTENTI SOCIALI: DINAMICHE DI RAPPRESENTAZIONE E INTENTO EMANCIPATORIO. UNA RICERCA QUALITATIVA CON LA TECNICA COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE
Masciocchi, Sofia
2025
Abstract
The writing of social work reports represents a significant activity in the helping practice of social workers, not only in terms of time (Cabiati, 2015; Lillis et al., 2020), but above all in terms of the impact this activity has on the lives of people who turn to social services (Roose et al., 2009; McDonald et al., 2015). National and international literature on social work writing focuses on technical skills in terms of content organization, clarity, conciseness, and accuracy—particularly in reference manuals (Ricucci, 2009; Quaglia, 2010; Bini, 2018; Healy & Mulholland, 2019; Rai, 2021; Gagliardi, 2022)—as well as on pedagogical aspects of social work education (Alter & Adkins, 2001, 2006; Grise-Owens & Crum, 2012; Nelson & Weatherald, 2014; Houston & McColgan, 2014; Nkateng & Wharton, 2015; Thomas et al., 2016). Writing, on the other hand, is an opportunity to put into practice the discretionary nature of social work and carries important ethical as well as methodological implications (Carney & Koncel, 1994; Taylor, 2008). Reflections from Critical Anti-Oppressive Social Work (Dominelli, 2002; Dalrymple & Burke, 2006; Thompson, 2016; Sanfelici, 2024)—with a postmodern constructionist perspective (Fook, 2016; Healy, 2014)—and from Relational Social Work (Donati, 1991; Folgheraiter, 1998, 2011) help us recognize written text as a powerful vehicle for “discourses” and “narratives” (Parton & O’Byrne, 2000; Taylor & White, 2000), and as a potential helping tool in terms of recognition, empowerment, and participation (Roose et al., 2009; Krumer-Nevo & Sidi, 2012a, 2012b; Humphreys & Kertesz, 2013; Weiss-Gal et al., 2014; Roets et al., 2015, 2017; Krumer-Nevo, 2020; Raineri & Landi, 2023). The doctoral dissertation presented here illustrates the research conducted between 2021 and 2023 in Italy, using a qualitative approach within the framework of Practice Research (Uggerhøj, 2011). Through online focus groups, document analysis, and a Community of Practice (Wenger, 1998), the research involved 49 social workers and collected 33 reports to understand how writing, as a professional practice, fits into the social work helping relationship. The aim of the research was to explore the emancipatory intent of social work within the professional practice of report writing by social workers. Drawing on both data-driven and theory-driven analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006), the dissertation offers reflections on the characteristics of reports written by social workers, as well as on practitioners’ experiences and opinions on the topic. It also presents a deeper examination of the concept of power in the professional writing process, connected to the dynamics of representation and narration of life stories, and to the potentially oppressive yet simultaneously emancipatory nature of social work texts for people who turn to services. Finally, attention is drawn to levels of participation in writing processes, offering an opportunity to explore the identity of professional writing in social work.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Tesiphd_completa_Masciocchi.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia file ?:
Tesi di dottorato
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
4.24 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
4.24 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



