I. The current reflection on a possible EU instrument on the law governing rights in rem. – II. The unilateralist flavour of the lex rei sitae rule: is there any room left for overriding mandatory provisions in the field of rights in rem? - III. The recovery of illegally transferred non-cultural objects. – IV. The enforcement of duties pertaining to the moveable assets in question. – V. Concluding remarks.
Franzina, P., What Role for Overriding Mandatory Provisions of Third Countries in Conflicts of Laws Relating to Rights in Rem in Moveable Non-cultural Property?, in Font-Mas, M. (ed.), Private International Law on Rights in rem in the European Union. Derecho internacional privado sobre derechos reales en la Unión Europea, Marcial Pons, Madrid 2024: 469- 476. https://doi.org/10.37417/PILRIRUE/19 [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/298857]
What Role for Overriding Mandatory Provisions of Third Countries in Conflicts of Laws Relating to Rights in Rem in Moveable Non-cultural Property?
Franzina, Pietro
2024
Abstract
I. The current reflection on a possible EU instrument on the law governing rights in rem. – II. The unilateralist flavour of the lex rei sitae rule: is there any room left for overriding mandatory provisions in the field of rights in rem? - III. The recovery of illegally transferred non-cultural objects. – IV. The enforcement of duties pertaining to the moveable assets in question. – V. Concluding remarks.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
