This chapter supports the claim that the interplay between ‘state capacity’ and the ‘capacity to aspire’ finds its Archimedean Point in the fuzzy field of ‘layered resilience’. The conclusion also provides suggestions for future research within the matrix of migrant population/local state/pandemic/integration. After outlining some insights from our research, that might contribute to a sociological understanding of the concept of ‘layered resilience’, this chapter concludes with a brief view about continuity and difference between COVID-19 and previous pandemics that shaped world history.
Caselli, M., Dürrschmidt, J., Eade, J., Conclusion: Towards a Sociological Understanding of Layered Resilience, in Marco Casell, M. C., Jörg Dürrschmid, J. D., John Ead, J. E. (ed.), Migrants’ (Im)mobilities in Three European Urban Contexts. Global Pandemic and Beyond, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham 2024: 215- 222 [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/269837]
Conclusion: Towards a Sociological Understanding of Layered Resilience
Caselli, Marco;
2024
Abstract
This chapter supports the claim that the interplay between ‘state capacity’ and the ‘capacity to aspire’ finds its Archimedean Point in the fuzzy field of ‘layered resilience’. The conclusion also provides suggestions for future research within the matrix of migrant population/local state/pandemic/integration. After outlining some insights from our research, that might contribute to a sociological understanding of the concept of ‘layered resilience’, this chapter concludes with a brief view about continuity and difference between COVID-19 and previous pandemics that shaped world history.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
