The short Italian history of agile working began well before the publication of Law 81/2017, which regulated its essential aspects. Ten years ago, a number of large companies (such as San Pellegrino, Nestlé and Solvay) led the way, facilitated by advanced organisational contexts and good industrial relations that allowed them to anticipate the innovation of work and its ‘geography’ (not necessarily limited to places ‘within’ the traditional company perimeters). However, an often overlooked fact is that the public administration (PA), even before that pioneering phase, had also been able to place itself among the forerunners in the introduction of agile working, albeit having to deal with some of its atavistic rigidity (first and foremost, the delay in the digitalisation of services and related procedures associated with the cultural gap in terms of organisational re-design) and having to come to terms with the multifaceted nature of the various operational contexts, targets and territorial differences that complicated the overall framework of public work (and continue to make it very intricate).

Pesenti, L., Scansani, G., Agile working in public administration, in Boschetti, B., Vendramini, E. (ed.), Report on the Future and Innovation of Public Administration – 2022, EDUCatt - Ente per il Diritto allo Studio Universitario dell’Università Cattolica, Milano 2023: 2022 197- 207 [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/252454]

Agile working in public administration

Pesenti, Luca;
2023

Abstract

The short Italian history of agile working began well before the publication of Law 81/2017, which regulated its essential aspects. Ten years ago, a number of large companies (such as San Pellegrino, Nestlé and Solvay) led the way, facilitated by advanced organisational contexts and good industrial relations that allowed them to anticipate the innovation of work and its ‘geography’ (not necessarily limited to places ‘within’ the traditional company perimeters). However, an often overlooked fact is that the public administration (PA), even before that pioneering phase, had also been able to place itself among the forerunners in the introduction of agile working, albeit having to deal with some of its atavistic rigidity (first and foremost, the delay in the digitalisation of services and related procedures associated with the cultural gap in terms of organisational re-design) and having to come to terms with the multifaceted nature of the various operational contexts, targets and territorial differences that complicated the overall framework of public work (and continue to make it very intricate).
2023
Inglese
Report on the Future and Innovation of Public Administration – 2022
979−12−5535−162−7
EDUCatt - Ente per il Diritto allo Studio Universitario dell’Università Cattolica
2022
Pesenti, L., Scansani, G., Agile working in public administration, in Boschetti, B., Vendramini, E. (ed.), Report on the Future and Innovation of Public Administration – 2022, EDUCatt - Ente per il Diritto allo Studio Universitario dell’Università Cattolica, Milano 2023: 2022 197- 207 [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/252454]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/252454
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact