It is more than 20 years since artificial nerve guides (or conduits) were introduced into clinical practice as a reliable alternative to autograft. They are basically cylindrical conduits inside which a regenerating nerve stump may find protection and guidance. Early guides were made of silicone and were not biodegradable; they were shown to support nerve regeneration but, subsequently, were considered responsible for stenosis of the regenerated nerve in several instances, which required their removal. Degradable guides have been proposed and are now widely used. An overview of the clinical outcome of artificial nerve guides in peripheral nerve-gap injuries has shown that they perform at least as well as autografts in gaps that are no longer than 20 mm, bringing the significant advantage of avoiding donor site sacrifice and morbidity. The present knowledge and limitations of contemporary nerve guides are illustrated; research to improve the present designs is discussed. © 2009 Springer-Verlag Milan.

Merolli, A., Rocchi, L., Peripheral nerve regeneration by artificial nerve guides, in Antonio, M., Thomas, J. (ed.), Biomaterials in Hand Surgery, Springer Milan, Milano 2009: 127- 143. 10.1007/978-88-470-1195-3_9 [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/250054]

Peripheral nerve regeneration by artificial nerve guides

Merolli, Antonio;Rocchi, Lorenzo
2009

Abstract

It is more than 20 years since artificial nerve guides (or conduits) were introduced into clinical practice as a reliable alternative to autograft. They are basically cylindrical conduits inside which a regenerating nerve stump may find protection and guidance. Early guides were made of silicone and were not biodegradable; they were shown to support nerve regeneration but, subsequently, were considered responsible for stenosis of the regenerated nerve in several instances, which required their removal. Degradable guides have been proposed and are now widely used. An overview of the clinical outcome of artificial nerve guides in peripheral nerve-gap injuries has shown that they perform at least as well as autografts in gaps that are no longer than 20 mm, bringing the significant advantage of avoiding donor site sacrifice and morbidity. The present knowledge and limitations of contemporary nerve guides are illustrated; research to improve the present designs is discussed. © 2009 Springer-Verlag Milan.
2009
Inglese
Biomaterials in Hand Surgery
978-884701194-6
Springer Milan
Merolli, A., Rocchi, L., Peripheral nerve regeneration by artificial nerve guides, in Antonio, M., Thomas, J. (ed.), Biomaterials in Hand Surgery, Springer Milan, Milano 2009: 127- 143. 10.1007/978-88-470-1195-3_9 [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/250054]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/250054
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact