When terms such as sustainability, sustainable development, UN Agenda 2030 are mentioned, they refer to certain commitments by different categories of social actors (including companies), which should limit the negative impacts on the economy, people and the environment and create a certain social impact. In this regard, it is pointed out that the very concept of social impact often remains very distant from the commitments made and communicated by companies in their reports and even more so from what companies actually do. This critical conceptual analysis aims to discuss and overcome the thesis that the more one talks about a topic, the more others will know about it and deal with it. Today’s social and environmental reporting practices are often very distant from the real ability to capture the true and concrete potential to create social impact and to create opportunities for improvement towards a more sustainable context.

Torelli, R., “What I Say Is Not Necessarily What I Do”: A Critical Conceptual Analysis of the (Missing) Link between Corporate Sustainability Reporting and Social Impact, in Slobodan, K., Johannes, K. D., Kristian, J. S. (ed.), Measuring Sustainability and CSR: From Reporting to Decision-Making, Springer, Cham 2023: <<ETHICAL ECONOMY>>, 64 27- 36. 10.1007/978-3-031-26959-2_4 [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/231523]

“What I Say Is Not Necessarily What I Do”: A Critical Conceptual Analysis of the (Missing) Link between Corporate Sustainability Reporting and Social Impact

Torelli, Riccardo
2023

Abstract

When terms such as sustainability, sustainable development, UN Agenda 2030 are mentioned, they refer to certain commitments by different categories of social actors (including companies), which should limit the negative impacts on the economy, people and the environment and create a certain social impact. In this regard, it is pointed out that the very concept of social impact often remains very distant from the commitments made and communicated by companies in their reports and even more so from what companies actually do. This critical conceptual analysis aims to discuss and overcome the thesis that the more one talks about a topic, the more others will know about it and deal with it. Today’s social and environmental reporting practices are often very distant from the real ability to capture the true and concrete potential to create social impact and to create opportunities for improvement towards a more sustainable context.
2023
Inglese
Measuring Sustainability and CSR: From Reporting to Decision-Making
978-3-031-26958-5
Springer
64
Torelli, R., “What I Say Is Not Necessarily What I Do”: A Critical Conceptual Analysis of the (Missing) Link between Corporate Sustainability Reporting and Social Impact, in Slobodan, K., Johannes, K. D., Kristian, J. S. (ed.), Measuring Sustainability and CSR: From Reporting to Decision-Making, Springer, Cham 2023: <<ETHICAL ECONOMY>>, 64 27- 36. 10.1007/978-3-031-26959-2_4 [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/231523]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/231523
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact