Through urban expansion, cities have continued to generate new peripheries, but these are no longer included in a common, comprehensive project as would have occurred – albeit in a subordinate way – at the time of the industrial city. In the public narrative and in media coverage, the peripheries remain on the margins of innovation, know-how, culture and the workplace. They are thus considered as unlikely places for decision-making, for being of importance and for making themselves heard. In other words, the peripheries are marginalised and reduced to a dimension of extreme relegation. Our reflection on this topic arises from the fact that although there are many studies in international literature that deal with this theme, urban peripheries have not been uniformly defined. As a result, we often equate the term periphery as a place lacking quality and positive characteristics, a place to where poor people and migrants are relegated. Using the distinction between “old” and “new” peripheries as a starting point, this chapter aims to address this relational concept, always linked to another on which it depends, in this case that of the “centre”, by interpreting it in the plural. In fact, there is not just one periphery, but many peripheries, each with its own characteristics and potential. In this respect, each periphery is not just the result of a simple fact or distance, but the product of choices and policies. These reflections lead us to consider the importance of the territorial aspect, which cannot be separated from the social and institutional one. Based on considerations regarding European countries and avoiding the idealisation of the concepts of neighbourhood and mixité, this chapter will reflect on the need to propose policies to revitalise these areas (urban regeneration programmes), thereby enhancing their specific characteristics in the urban context, also in terms of intercultural dialogue: they are, in fact, one of the main testing grounds of the European social model. Drawing on the experiences examined, revitalising the peripheries means combining place-based policies with traditional social policies (housing, training, work and security).
Molinari, P., Revitalising Urban Peripheries, in Colombo M., G. G. (ed.), Intercultural Issues and Concepts. A Multi-Disciplinary Glossary, Peter Lang, Brussels 2021: <<Europe of culture/Dialogues>>, 22 235- 247 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/187258]
Revitalising Urban Peripheries
Molinari, Paolo
2021
Abstract
Through urban expansion, cities have continued to generate new peripheries, but these are no longer included in a common, comprehensive project as would have occurred – albeit in a subordinate way – at the time of the industrial city. In the public narrative and in media coverage, the peripheries remain on the margins of innovation, know-how, culture and the workplace. They are thus considered as unlikely places for decision-making, for being of importance and for making themselves heard. In other words, the peripheries are marginalised and reduced to a dimension of extreme relegation. Our reflection on this topic arises from the fact that although there are many studies in international literature that deal with this theme, urban peripheries have not been uniformly defined. As a result, we often equate the term periphery as a place lacking quality and positive characteristics, a place to where poor people and migrants are relegated. Using the distinction between “old” and “new” peripheries as a starting point, this chapter aims to address this relational concept, always linked to another on which it depends, in this case that of the “centre”, by interpreting it in the plural. In fact, there is not just one periphery, but many peripheries, each with its own characteristics and potential. In this respect, each periphery is not just the result of a simple fact or distance, but the product of choices and policies. These reflections lead us to consider the importance of the territorial aspect, which cannot be separated from the social and institutional one. Based on considerations regarding European countries and avoiding the idealisation of the concepts of neighbourhood and mixité, this chapter will reflect on the need to propose policies to revitalise these areas (urban regeneration programmes), thereby enhancing their specific characteristics in the urban context, also in terms of intercultural dialogue: they are, in fact, one of the main testing grounds of the European social model. Drawing on the experiences examined, revitalising the peripheries means combining place-based policies with traditional social policies (housing, training, work and security).I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.