The course of study characterised by its diachronic perspective shows the richness of a perspective that anchors terminology in its diachrony, in the history of language and thought, in its evolutionary dimension as well, while confirming the need for knowledge and analysis of the disciplinary and cultural context. This perspective combines theses approaches and shows that everything is important for analyses of semantic complexity with the means offered by digital humanities. Discourse analysis, social or cultural history in lexical studies, lexical semantics, lexicometrics, socioterminology and specialized lexicography are the background of works that diachronic terminology renews, with the sharp analysis of cases concerning languages, corpora, and language histories. The conceptual and designative activities around the knowledge of the nature of terminological facts observed in a diachronic perspective - metaterminology - acquire an even more significant role, as terminological "realia" force us to verify their scope and effectiveness. Diachronic terminology makes it possible to study the evolution of forms and meanings in vocabularies and in specialized lexicography, as well as the evolution in relationships between concepts and terms, between terminology and neology, whether in the course of a given period of a specialized domain or sub-domain, in long or short diachrony. Articles by Jana Altmanova, Anne Condamines, Bruno Courbon, Pascaline Dury, Wael Farouq, Paolo Frassi, Julie Humbert-Droz, John Humbley, Aurélie Picton, Francesca Piselli, Anne-Delphine Rousseau et Maria Teresa Zanola.
Zanola, M. (ed.), Terminologie diachronique: méthodologies et études de cas, <<CAHIERS DE LEXICOLOGIE>>, 2021; 2021: (118): 289 . 10.48611/isbn.978-2-406-12006-3 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/181398]
Autori: | ||
Titolo: | Terminologie diachronique: méthodologies et études de cas | |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | http://dx.doi.org/10.48611/isbn.978-2-406-12006-3 | |
URL: | https://classiques-garnier.com/cahiers-de-lexicologie-2021-1-n-118-terminologie-diachronique-methodologies-et-etudes-de-cas.html | |
Data di pubblicazione: | 2021 | |
Abstract: | The course of study characterised by its diachronic perspective shows the richness of a perspective that anchors terminology in its diachrony, in the history of language and thought, in its evolutionary dimension as well, while confirming the need for knowledge and analysis of the disciplinary and cultural context. This perspective combines theses approaches and shows that everything is important for analyses of semantic complexity with the means offered by digital humanities. Discourse analysis, social or cultural history in lexical studies, lexical semantics, lexicometrics, socioterminology and specialized lexicography are the background of works that diachronic terminology renews, with the sharp analysis of cases concerning languages, corpora, and language histories. The conceptual and designative activities around the knowledge of the nature of terminological facts observed in a diachronic perspective - metaterminology - acquire an even more significant role, as terminological "realia" force us to verify their scope and effectiveness. Diachronic terminology makes it possible to study the evolution of forms and meanings in vocabularies and in specialized lexicography, as well as the evolution in relationships between concepts and terms, between terminology and neology, whether in the course of a given period of a specialized domain or sub-domain, in long or short diachrony. Articles by Jana Altmanova, Anne Condamines, Bruno Courbon, Pascaline Dury, Wael Farouq, Paolo Frassi, Julie Humbert-Droz, John Humbley, Aurélie Picton, Francesca Piselli, Anne-Delphine Rousseau et Maria Teresa Zanola. | |
Abstract: | La filière d’études caractérisée par sa perspective diachronique permet de montrer la richesse d'une perspective qui ancre la terminologie dans sa diachronie, dans l’histoire de la langue et de la pensée, dans sa dimension évolutive aussi, tout en confirmant la nécessité de la connaissance et de l’analyse du contexte disciplinaire et culturel. Cette perspective unit les approches citées et montre que tout est important pour pouvoir aborder des analyses de complexité sémantique avec les moyens que les humanités numériques nous offrent aujourd’hui. L’analyse du discours, l’histoire sociale ou culturelle dans les études sur le lexique, la sémantique lexicale, la lexicométrie, la socioterminologie, la lexicographie spécialisée sont l’arrière-plan des pistes de travail que la terminologie diachronique renouvelle ainsi, avec l’analyse pointue de cas concernant des langues, des corpus et des histoires langagières. Les activités conceptuelles et désignatives autour de la connaissance de la nature des faits terminologiques observés en perspective diachronique – la métaterminologie – acquièrent un rôle encore plus significatif, du fait que les "realia" terminologiques obligent à en vérifier la portée et l’efficacité. La terminologie diachronique permet d'aborder l’étude de l’évolution de formes et de sens dans les vocabulaires et dans la lexicographie spécialisée, aussi bien que les rapports évolutifs entre concepts et termes, entre terminologie et néologie, que ce soit au cours d’une période déterminée d’un domaine ou d’un sous-domaine spécialisé, en diachronie longue ou courte. Articles de Jana Altmanova, Anne Condamines, Bruno Courbon, Pascaline Dury, Wael Farouq, Paolo Frassi, Julie Humbert-Droz, John Humbley, Aurélie Picton, Francesca Piselli, Anne-Delphine Rousseau et Maria Teresa Zanola. | |
Lingua: | Francese | |
Rivista: | ||
Citazione: | Zanola, M. (ed.), Terminologie diachronique: méthodologies et études de cas, <<CAHIERS DE LEXICOLOGIE>>, 2021; 2021: (118): 289 . 10.48611/isbn.978-2-406-12006-3 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/181398] | |
Appare nelle tipologie: | Curatela di numero monografico di rivista |