This chapter provides a bridge between the critical policy analysis offered in the first half of the book and the analysis of public opinion survey data in the second half. Comparing before and after the Uprisings, it does three things. First, it examines the changing political context within which the EU is delivering the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) in the Southern Mediterranean (SM). Secondly, it considers how the mechanisms and tools of delivery changed in practice after the Uprisings, specifically considering the EU’s claims to innovative changes. Thirdly, it examines the EU’s practices in delivering democracy and ‘money, markets and mobility’. It concludes by arguing that there is little evidence of innovative changes of the EU practices in delivering the ENP in the SM after the Uprisings, that it has continued to support authoritarian regimes and that there is little evidence that the people of Southern Mediterranean Countries (SMCs) are benefitting from the ENP.
Teti, A., Abbott, P., Talbot, V., Maggiolini, P. M. L. C., EU Delivery and Practice: Democracy Assistance, Aid and Trade Before and After the Uprisings, in Teti Andrea, A. P. V. P. (ed.), Democratisation against Democracy. How EU Foreign Policy Fails the Middle East, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham 2020: <<THE EUROPEAN UNION IN INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS>>, 147- 195. 10.1007/978-3-030-33883-1_5 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/170387]
EU Delivery and Practice: Democracy Assistance, Aid and Trade Before and After the Uprisings
Talbot, Valeria;Maggiolini, Paolo Maria Leo Cesare
2020
Abstract
This chapter provides a bridge between the critical policy analysis offered in the first half of the book and the analysis of public opinion survey data in the second half. Comparing before and after the Uprisings, it does three things. First, it examines the changing political context within which the EU is delivering the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) in the Southern Mediterranean (SM). Secondly, it considers how the mechanisms and tools of delivery changed in practice after the Uprisings, specifically considering the EU’s claims to innovative changes. Thirdly, it examines the EU’s practices in delivering democracy and ‘money, markets and mobility’. It concludes by arguing that there is little evidence of innovative changes of the EU practices in delivering the ENP in the SM after the Uprisings, that it has continued to support authoritarian regimes and that there is little evidence that the people of Southern Mediterranean Countries (SMCs) are benefitting from the ENP.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.