The UK’s distinctive ‘flexible interpretation’ of legal concepts and instruments also accounts for the lack of a clear-cut distinction between the rationales underlying legislation concerning migration and asylum. This is in line with the traditional pragmatic attitude of the British government, which has regularly conflated the two policies within an overarching strategy aimed at enhancing its control over the inflow of foreigners into the country. Accordingly, the Immigration Act 2014 and its 2016 updates were explicitly designed to create a ‘hostile environment’ for migration. This tale of distinctiveness, however, is tempered by the ‘normalisation pressure’ that the country has been subjected to as a member of the European Union (EU) and the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR), especially in the area of asylum law. Regardless of the results in terms of policy orientations and actual practices, a number of significant elements of a continental-style human-rights protection have been progressively influencing the conceptual context, the content of law and the role of the judiciary in the UK asylum (and migration) policy area.

Zotti, A., United Kingdom - Definitions and legislative frameworks of the United Kingdom’s migration policy, in Zotti, A. (ed.), The European Migration System and Global Justice. Definitions and Legislative Frameworks in France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Norway and the United Kingdom, ARENA Centre for European Studies, Oslo 2019: <<ARENA REPORT>>, 2019 197- 234 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/153365]

United Kingdom - Definitions and legislative frameworks of the United Kingdom’s migration policy

Zotti, Antonio
Primo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
2019

Abstract

The UK’s distinctive ‘flexible interpretation’ of legal concepts and instruments also accounts for the lack of a clear-cut distinction between the rationales underlying legislation concerning migration and asylum. This is in line with the traditional pragmatic attitude of the British government, which has regularly conflated the two policies within an overarching strategy aimed at enhancing its control over the inflow of foreigners into the country. Accordingly, the Immigration Act 2014 and its 2016 updates were explicitly designed to create a ‘hostile environment’ for migration. This tale of distinctiveness, however, is tempered by the ‘normalisation pressure’ that the country has been subjected to as a member of the European Union (EU) and the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR), especially in the area of asylum law. Regardless of the results in terms of policy orientations and actual practices, a number of significant elements of a continental-style human-rights protection have been progressively influencing the conceptual context, the content of law and the role of the judiciary in the UK asylum (and migration) policy area.
Inglese
The European Migration System and Global Justice. Definitions and Legislative Frameworks in France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Norway and the United Kingdom
978-82-8362-036-8
ARENA Centre for European Studies
2019
Zotti, A., United Kingdom - Definitions and legislative frameworks of the United Kingdom’s migration policy, in Zotti, A. (ed.), The European Migration System and Global Justice. Definitions and Legislative Frameworks in France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Norway and the United Kingdom, ARENA Centre for European Studies, Oslo 2019: <<ARENA REPORT>>, 2019 197- 234 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/153365]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/153365
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact