1. Introduction. – 2. The raison d’être of public policy. – 2.1. In the conflicts of laws. – 2.2. In the recognition of judgments. – 3. The object and nature of the assessment. – 3.1. The effects of the foreign law or judgment concerned in the circumstances of the case. – 3.2. The ‘regularity’ of the foreign law or judgment in question. – 3.2.1. A matter of ‘international’, not internal, regularity. – 3.2.2. International standards as part of a State’s public policy. – 4. Assessing whether the public policy defence ought to be raised in a given set of circumstances. – 4.1. A strict scrutiny. – 4.2. An inherently discretionary assessment. – 4.3. Taming the enfant terrible: some possible guidelines. – 4.3.1. The rank of the rules in which a particular value is enshrined. – 4.3.2. The seriousness of the infringement. – 4.3.3. The ties between the situation and the forum. – 5. The consequences of raising the defence. – 5.1. In the conflicts of laws. – 5.1.1. The ousting effect. – 5.1.2. The subsidiarily applicable law. – 5.2. In the recognition of judgments. – 6. Concluding remarks.

Franzina, P., The Purpose and Operation of the Public Policy Defence as Applied to Punitive Damages, in Bariatti, S., Fumagalli, L., Crespi Reghizzi, Z. (ed.), Punitive Damages and Private International Law: State of the Art and Future Developments, Wolters Kluwer Italia, Milano 2019: 43- 74 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/147402]

The Purpose and Operation of the Public Policy Defence as Applied to Punitive Damages

Franzina, Pietro
2019

Abstract

1. Introduction. – 2. The raison d’être of public policy. – 2.1. In the conflicts of laws. – 2.2. In the recognition of judgments. – 3. The object and nature of the assessment. – 3.1. The effects of the foreign law or judgment concerned in the circumstances of the case. – 3.2. The ‘regularity’ of the foreign law or judgment in question. – 3.2.1. A matter of ‘international’, not internal, regularity. – 3.2.2. International standards as part of a State’s public policy. – 4. Assessing whether the public policy defence ought to be raised in a given set of circumstances. – 4.1. A strict scrutiny. – 4.2. An inherently discretionary assessment. – 4.3. Taming the enfant terrible: some possible guidelines. – 4.3.1. The rank of the rules in which a particular value is enshrined. – 4.3.2. The seriousness of the infringement. – 4.3.3. The ties between the situation and the forum. – 5. The consequences of raising the defence. – 5.1. In the conflicts of laws. – 5.1.1. The ousting effect. – 5.1.2. The subsidiarily applicable law. – 5.2. In the recognition of judgments. – 6. Concluding remarks.
2019
Inglese
Punitive Damages and Private International Law: State of the Art and Future Developments
9788813370664
Wolters Kluwer Italia
Franzina, P., The Purpose and Operation of the Public Policy Defence as Applied to Punitive Damages, in Bariatti, S., Fumagalli, L., Crespi Reghizzi, Z. (ed.), Punitive Damages and Private International Law: State of the Art and Future Developments, Wolters Kluwer Italia, Milano 2019: 43- 74 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/147402]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/147402
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact