The relative weight that should be given to the various sources on Valentinian Gnosticism is a matter that constantly needs to be rethought. There are sources that have been largely neglected, suc as the document in Epiphanius Panarion 31.5-6, tha so-called Lehrbrief ('Doctrinal Letter'), an indipendent account of the Pleroma which several scholars have regarded as a late, even a degenerate version of the Valentinian system. This paper reintroduces this document into discussion about the early development of Valentinian doctrine, and produces arguments that it was known already by Irenaeus (165 AD), who may have used it (or a similar text) as one of his sources.
Il peso relativo che dovrebbe essere dato alle varie fonti sullo gnosticismo valentiniano è una questione che deve essere costantemente ripensata. Ci sono fonti che sono state in gran parte trascurate, come nel documento di Epiphanius Panarion 31.5-6, la cosiddetta Lehrbrief ('Lettera dottrinale'), un resoconto indipendente del Pleroma che molti studiosi hanno considerato un testo tardo, persino una versione degenerata del sistema valentiniano. Il presente contributo reintroduce questo documento nella discussione relativa al primo sviluppo della dottrina valentiniana e produce argomenti per dimostrare che era già noto a Ireneo (165 d.C.), che potrebbe averlo usato (oppure avere usato un testo simile) come una delle sue fonti.
Chiapparini, G., Fragments of an Early 'Lost' Valentinianism: Irenaeus and the Gnostic Doctrinal Letter of Epiphanius, Panarion 31.5-6, in Markschies, C., Thomassen, E. (ed.), Valentinianism: New Studies, Brill, Leiden-Boston 2020: <<NAG HAMMADI AND MANICHAEAN STUDIES>>, 96 122- 142. 10.1163/9789004414815_007 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/147118]
Fragments of an Early 'Lost' Valentinianism: Irenaeus and the Gnostic Doctrinal Letter of Epiphanius, Panarion 31.5-6
Chiapparini, GiulianoPrimo
2020
Abstract
The relative weight that should be given to the various sources on Valentinian Gnosticism is a matter that constantly needs to be rethought. There are sources that have been largely neglected, suc as the document in Epiphanius Panarion 31.5-6, tha so-called Lehrbrief ('Doctrinal Letter'), an indipendent account of the Pleroma which several scholars have regarded as a late, even a degenerate version of the Valentinian system. This paper reintroduces this document into discussion about the early development of Valentinian doctrine, and produces arguments that it was known already by Irenaeus (165 AD), who may have used it (or a similar text) as one of his sources.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.