1. The Commission’s proposal of 2018. - 2. The absence in the proposal of any private international law rule. - 3. The relationship of the proposed regulation with the Rome I and II Regulations. - 4. The missing link: jurisdiction. - 5. Grounds on which a platform operator may be sued in the Union. - 6. Cases where the jurisdiction of Union’s courts may be excluded by agreement. - 7. Providing users with the right to access a Union’s court: possible patterns. - 8. Concluding remarks.
Franzina, P., Promoting Fairness and Transparency for Business Users of Online Platforms, in Pretelli, I. (ed.), Conflict of Laws in the Maze of Digital Platforms / Le droit international privé dans le labyrinthe des plateformes digitales, Schulthess, Zurich 2018: 147- 162 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/146628]
Promoting Fairness and Transparency for Business Users of Online Platforms
Franzina, Pietro
2018
Abstract
1. The Commission’s proposal of 2018. - 2. The absence in the proposal of any private international law rule. - 3. The relationship of the proposed regulation with the Rome I and II Regulations. - 4. The missing link: jurisdiction. - 5. Grounds on which a platform operator may be sued in the Union. - 6. Cases where the jurisdiction of Union’s courts may be excluded by agreement. - 7. Providing users with the right to access a Union’s court: possible patterns. - 8. Concluding remarks.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
