The picture of philosophy we obtain from contemporary naturalism is that of a kind of “ancilla scientiarum”: philosophy adopts scientific methods and procedures, its nature is a posteriori as that of the sciences. In this essay I intend to examine whether these results necessarily derive from the recent development of neuroscience, or if there are other plausible ways of conceiving the relationship between philosophy and neuroscience.
Corradini, A., Philosophy and Neuroscience, The Ways Things Are. Studies in Ontology, Ontos, Frankfurt ; Lancaster -- DEU 2011 <<Philosophical Analysis>>, 1: 203-219 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/14271]
Philosophy and Neuroscience
Corradini, Antonella
2011
Abstract
The picture of philosophy we obtain from contemporary naturalism is that of a kind of “ancilla scientiarum”: philosophy adopts scientific methods and procedures, its nature is a posteriori as that of the sciences. In this essay I intend to examine whether these results necessarily derive from the recent development of neuroscience, or if there are other plausible ways of conceiving the relationship between philosophy and neuroscience.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
