The present study examines active ageing in a representative sample of 900 subjects between the ages of 65 and 74, with the aim to identify the elements of successful ageing from the perspective of active intergenerational exchanges. Particular attention was paid to the identification of factors that either boost or hinder wellbeing in later life by relating four fundamental aspects of the activity: the goals that the elderly pursue, values, resources upon which they can rely, both at a material and relational level, norms and practices of exchange within family and social networks. The adopted perspective led to three different ageing profiles being found that were characteristic - in different degrees - of the Italian population. There were clear differences between elderly people who had prematurely withdrawn and those who conceive themselves as still having a pivotal role in their families and society. The former tend to perceive themselves as old, while for the latter, ageing is far from being a concern. It is clear that exchange, oriented both to light but entertaining sociability and support and intergenerational sharing of values, is crucial to the elderly persons’ ability to see themselves as active and satisfied with their condition.

Bramanti, D., Meda, S. G., Rossi, G., Active Ageing among the Generations: Towards an Age-Friendly Society?, in Bramanti, D., Meda, S., Rossi, G., Regalia, C., Manzi, C., Zanarott, I. M., Rosina, A., Widmer, E., Girardin, M., De St. Aubin, E., Pagan-vega, A., Tamanza, G., Marta, E., Pozzi, M., Jensen, P., De Tavernier, W., Sourbati, S. M., Lanzetti, C., Living Longer. A Resource for the family an Opportunity for Society, Common Ground Publishing, Champaign-Illinois 2018: 1-34 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/127134]

Active Ageing among the Generations: Towards an Age-Friendly Society?

Bramanti, Donatella
Primo
;
Meda, Stefania Giada
Secondo
;
Rossi, Giovanna
Ultimo
2018

Abstract

The present study examines active ageing in a representative sample of 900 subjects between the ages of 65 and 74, with the aim to identify the elements of successful ageing from the perspective of active intergenerational exchanges. Particular attention was paid to the identification of factors that either boost or hinder wellbeing in later life by relating four fundamental aspects of the activity: the goals that the elderly pursue, values, resources upon which they can rely, both at a material and relational level, norms and practices of exchange within family and social networks. The adopted perspective led to three different ageing profiles being found that were characteristic - in different degrees - of the Italian population. There were clear differences between elderly people who had prematurely withdrawn and those who conceive themselves as still having a pivotal role in their families and society. The former tend to perceive themselves as old, while for the latter, ageing is far from being a concern. It is clear that exchange, oriented both to light but entertaining sociability and support and intergenerational sharing of values, is crucial to the elderly persons’ ability to see themselves as active and satisfied with their condition.
Inglese
9781863351096
Common Ground Publishing
Bramanti, D., Meda, S. G., Rossi, G., Active Ageing among the Generations: Towards an Age-Friendly Society?, in Bramanti, D., Meda, S., Rossi, G., Regalia, C., Manzi, C., Zanarott, I. M., Rosina, A., Widmer, E., Girardin, M., De St. Aubin, E., Pagan-vega, A., Tamanza, G., Marta, E., Pozzi, M., Jensen, P., De Tavernier, W., Sourbati, S. M., Lanzetti, C., Living Longer. A Resource for the family an Opportunity for Society, Common Ground Publishing, Champaign-Illinois 2018: 1-34 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/127134]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/10807/127134
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact