The chapter highlights the distinction between reflection (as a socio-cognitive capacity and disposition to think about one's work) and reflexivity (as a process which questions the ways in which people socially give sense to reality), exploring how organizational reflexivity can work as a practice. A case study exemple is presented to underpin the way we can detect and put in evidence tacit and implicit knowledge. Different ways of using reflexive practice are discussed in order to develop condictions for a reflexive exercise on such embedded and distributes dimensions.
Scaratti, G., Ripamonti, S. C., Between viewing and transforming: how reflexivity as practice works, in Marsico G., R. R. S. S. (ed.), Reflexivity and Psychology, The Yearbook of Idiographic Science,, Information Age Publishing, Inc., Charlotte, NC, USA 2015: 311- 342 [https://hdl.handle.net/10807/114727]
Between viewing and transforming: how reflexivity as practice works
Scaratti, Giuseppe
;Ripamonti, Silvio Carlo
2015
Abstract
The chapter highlights the distinction between reflection (as a socio-cognitive capacity and disposition to think about one's work) and reflexivity (as a process which questions the ways in which people socially give sense to reality), exploring how organizational reflexivity can work as a practice. A case study exemple is presented to underpin the way we can detect and put in evidence tacit and implicit knowledge. Different ways of using reflexive practice are discussed in order to develop condictions for a reflexive exercise on such embedded and distributes dimensions.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
