The paper analyses a few questions of Heinrich Scholz on Karl Barth’s dialectic theology: is it possible to view theology as a science? What is the meaning of a «theological proposition»? Which minimal formal constraints of meaningfulness shared with other sciences shall be observed in theological research? These issues are the necessary prerequisites for any rational discourse, hence for questions related to faith.
Fossati, L., Risk vs Logic. Karl Barth and Heinrich Scholz on Faith and Reason, in De Florio, C., Giordani, A. (ed.), From Arithmetic to Metaphysics. A Path through Philosophical Logic, De Gruyter, Boston-Berlin 2018: <<PHILOSOPHISCHE ANALYSE>>, 119- 133. 10.1515/9783110529494-009 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/112850]
Risk vs Logic. Karl Barth and Heinrich Scholz on Faith and Reason
Fossati, Lorenzo
2018
Abstract
The paper analyses a few questions of Heinrich Scholz on Karl Barth’s dialectic theology: is it possible to view theology as a science? What is the meaning of a «theological proposition»? Which minimal formal constraints of meaningfulness shared with other sciences shall be observed in theological research? These issues are the necessary prerequisites for any rational discourse, hence for questions related to faith.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Fossati - Risk vs Logic. Karl Barth and HeinrichScholz on Faith and Reason.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia file ?:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Non specificato
Dimensione
251.95 kB
Formato
Unknown
|
251.95 kB | Unknown | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
