Though a wide range of scientific studies have been published on the topic of globalization, seemingly analyzed to the smallest detail, discussion of this issue is neither commonplace nor easy. Analysis of globalization is never done, as the process is undergoing continuous transformation along development trends that are neither linear nor predictable in advance. In addition, analysis of it is not easy, given that the term globalization has been used with different meanings in several frameworks, both scientific and otherwise (Fiss and Hirsch 2005). But, even considering a single discipline such as sociology, we find that it has not assigned a univocal meaning to the topic, and analyses of the underlying processes of globalization are conducted according to radically different perspectives and interpretations. Hence, there is no general consensus on the concept’s definition, its confines, and even, at least in part, its basic characteristics. Finally, as underscored by Scholte (2005: 46) with a good dose of irony, “the only consensus about globalization is that it is contested”.

Caselli, M., Gilardoni, G., Introduction: Globalization between Theories and Daily Life Experiences, in Caselli, M., Gilardoni, G. (ed.), Globalization, Supranational Dynamics and Local Experiences, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham 2018: <<EUROPE IN A GLOBAL CONTEXT>>, 1- 40. 10.1007/978-3-319-64075-4_1 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/109983]

Introduction: Globalization between Theories and Daily Life Experiences

Caselli, Marco
Primo
;
Gilardoni, Guia
Secondo
2018

Abstract

Though a wide range of scientific studies have been published on the topic of globalization, seemingly analyzed to the smallest detail, discussion of this issue is neither commonplace nor easy. Analysis of globalization is never done, as the process is undergoing continuous transformation along development trends that are neither linear nor predictable in advance. In addition, analysis of it is not easy, given that the term globalization has been used with different meanings in several frameworks, both scientific and otherwise (Fiss and Hirsch 2005). But, even considering a single discipline such as sociology, we find that it has not assigned a univocal meaning to the topic, and analyses of the underlying processes of globalization are conducted according to radically different perspectives and interpretations. Hence, there is no general consensus on the concept’s definition, its confines, and even, at least in part, its basic characteristics. Finally, as underscored by Scholte (2005: 46) with a good dose of irony, “the only consensus about globalization is that it is contested”.
2018
Inglese
Globalization, Supranational Dynamics and Local Experiences
9783319640747
Palgrave Macmillan
Caselli, M., Gilardoni, G., Introduction: Globalization between Theories and Daily Life Experiences, in Caselli, M., Gilardoni, G. (ed.), Globalization, Supranational Dynamics and Local Experiences, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham 2018: <<EUROPE IN A GLOBAL CONTEXT>>, 1- 40. 10.1007/978-3-319-64075-4_1 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/109983]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Caselli Gilardoni attr.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia file ?: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 498.33 kB
Formato Unknown
498.33 kB Unknown   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/109983
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact