A mistake was made in Fig. 2: in the lower blue box on the right-hand side, poor outcome is reported as being “very likely”, whereas in fact it is “likely”. The corrected Fig. 2 is supplied here. The authors regret this error and apologize for any inconvenience..
Nolan, J. P., Soar, J., Cariou, A., Cronberg, T., Moulaert, V. R. M., Deakin, C. D., Bottiger, B. W., Friberg, H., Sunde, K., Sandroni, C., Erratum to: European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine 2015 guidelines for post-resuscitation care, <<INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE>>, 2016; 42 (3): 488-489. [doi:10.1007/s00134-015-4158-6] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/89070]
Erratum to: European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine 2015 guidelines for post-resuscitation care
Sandroni, ClaudioUltimo
2016
Abstract
A mistake was made in Fig. 2: in the lower blue box on the right-hand side, poor outcome is reported as being “very likely”, whereas in fact it is “likely”. The corrected Fig. 2 is supplied here. The authors regret this error and apologize for any inconvenience..
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
