The thesis of this paper is that the problem of symbol – i.e. the problem of what its nature and its logic are – needs, to be solved, to deal with two basic categories: the category of mediation and the category of incarnation. More precisely, what I would like to argue is that the symbol can perform its basic function of mediation as it is based on a logic of incarnation. Unlike the sign, the symbol is in fact understandable as the paradoxical incarnation of two signifiers.

Biancu, S., Il simbolo, tra mediazione e incarnazione, in Bartolomei, M. C., L’interrogazione del simbolo, Mimesis, Milano - Udine 2015: 229-241 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/77075]

Il simbolo, tra mediazione e incarnazione

Biancu, Stefano
2015

Abstract

The thesis of this paper is that the problem of symbol – i.e. the problem of what its nature and its logic are – needs, to be solved, to deal with two basic categories: the category of mediation and the category of incarnation. More precisely, what I would like to argue is that the symbol can perform its basic function of mediation as it is based on a logic of incarnation. Unlike the sign, the symbol is in fact understandable as the paradoxical incarnation of two signifiers.
Italiano
978-88-575-2641-6
Mimesis
Biancu, S., Il simbolo, tra mediazione e incarnazione, in Bartolomei, M. C., L’interrogazione del simbolo, Mimesis, Milano - Udine 2015: 229-241 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/77075]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/10807/77075
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact