Direct comparison of CT and magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion techniques has been limited and in vivo assessment is affected by physiological variability, timing of image acquisition, and parameter selection.

Otton, J., Morton, G., Schuster, A., Bigalke, B., Marano, R., Olivotti, L., Nagel, E., Chiribiri, A., A direct comparison of the sensitivity of CT and MR cardiac perfusion using a myocardial perfusion phantom, <<JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY>>, 2013; 7 (2): 117-124. [doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2013.01.016] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/64676]

A direct comparison of the sensitivity of CT and MR cardiac perfusion using a myocardial perfusion phantom

Marano, Riccardo;
2013

Abstract

Direct comparison of CT and magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion techniques has been limited and in vivo assessment is affected by physiological variability, timing of image acquisition, and parameter selection.
2013
Inglese
Otton, J., Morton, G., Schuster, A., Bigalke, B., Marano, R., Olivotti, L., Nagel, E., Chiribiri, A., A direct comparison of the sensitivity of CT and MR cardiac perfusion using a myocardial perfusion phantom, <<JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY>>, 2013; 7 (2): 117-124. [doi:10.1016/j.jcct.2013.01.016] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/64676]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10807/64676
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact