To assess the effectiveness of the potential advantages with 3-dimensional-based treatment planning versus 2-dimensional pelvic bone-based treatment planning in patients with rectal cancer, controlled for clinical stage.
Gambacorta, M. A., Pasini, D., Minsky, B., Arcangeli, S., Mannocci, A., Barba, M. C., Barbaro, B., Manfrida, S., Balducci, M., Valentini, V., Is two-dimensional field definition sufficient for pelvic node coverage in rectal cancer compared to technical three-dimensional definition?, <<TUMORI>>, 2013; 99 (2): 191-198. [doi:10.1177/030089161309900212] [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/52306]
Is two-dimensional field definition sufficient for pelvic node coverage in rectal cancer compared to technical three-dimensional definition?
Gambacorta, Maria Antonietta;Pasini, Danilo;Arcangeli, Stefano;Mannocci, Alice;Barba, Maria Cristina;Barbaro, Brunella;Manfrida, Stefania;Balducci, Mario;Valentini, Vincenzo
2013
Abstract
To assess the effectiveness of the potential advantages with 3-dimensional-based treatment planning versus 2-dimensional pelvic bone-based treatment planning in patients with rectal cancer, controlled for clinical stage.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
