<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="https://hdl.handle.net/10807/200">
    <title>IRIS Tipologia:</title>
    <link>https://hdl.handle.net/10807/200</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://hdl.handle.net/10807/349001" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://hdl.handle.net/10807/348999" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://hdl.handle.net/10807/348998" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://hdl.handle.net/10807/348997" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-10-14T06:46:30Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="https://hdl.handle.net/10807/349001">
    <title>Glosse in margine a "Le società benefit" di Marco Palmieri</title>
    <link>https://hdl.handle.net/10807/349001</link>
    <description>Titolo: Glosse in margine a "Le società benefit" di Marco Palmieri
Autori: Presti, Gaetano</description>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://hdl.handle.net/10807/348999">
    <title>Sostenibilità valutativa e Progetto di Vita. Una direzione di ricerca per le transizioni plurali della persona con disabilità</title>
    <link>https://hdl.handle.net/10807/348999</link>
    <description>Titolo: Sostenibilità valutativa e Progetto di Vita. Una direzione di ricerca per le transizioni plurali della persona con disabilità
Autori: Biagio Di Liberto
Abstract: Il saggio propone il costrutto di sostenibilità valutativa: la valutazione formativa, pensata sull’intera vita della persona con disabilità, è chiamata a farsi sostenibile in forme evolutivamente plurali. Muove da un’asimmetria regolativa: il PEI codifica profilo e sostegni, non la valutazione formativa delle dimensioni non disciplinari. Il costrutto ha tre dimensioni, temporale-evolutiva, contestuale-mediativa ed etico-politica; la sua specificità rispetto a sustainable assessment, assessment dell’autodeterminazione, feedback literacy e assessment inclusivo sta nel confine che queste lasciano fermo: un costrutto da valutare personale, non invariante. Criteri di riconoscibilità, provati su un PEI, ne danno la definizione operativa; limiti epistemologici e operativi ne fissano la portata.
Abstract: The essay proposes the construct of evaluative sustainability: formative assessment, conceived over the whole life of persons with disabilities, must become sustainable in developmentally varying forms. It moves from a regulatory asymmetry: the IEP codifies profile and supports, not the formative assessment of its non-curricular dimensions. The construct has three dimensions, temporal-developmental, contextual-mediational and ethical-political; its specificity towards sustainable assessment, self-determination assessment, feedback literacy and inclusive assessment lies at the boundary these leave untouched: a construct to be assessed that is personal, not invariant. Recognisability criteria, tested on an IEP, give its operational definition; epistemological and operational limits bound it.</description>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://hdl.handle.net/10807/348998">
    <title>SEPARAZIONE DEI POTERI E DISCREZIONALITÀ DEI GIUDICI NEL PENSIERO DI GAETANO SILVESTRI</title>
    <link>https://hdl.handle.net/10807/348998</link>
    <description>Titolo: SEPARAZIONE DEI POTERI E DISCREZIONALITÀ DEI GIUDICI NEL PENSIERO DI GAETANO SILVESTRI
Autori: Michele Massa
Abstract: On the occasion of Gaetano Silvestri's 80th birthday, this essay examines the scholar's work on the problem of judicial discretion, that is, the spaces of choice that remain to judges in the exercise of their functions, especially constitutional justice, after having observed all pertinent procedural and substantive rules. After identifying Silvestri's definition of the concept of jurisdiction, in his broader reconstruction of the separation of powers, and emphasizing the centrality, in this concept, of judicial independence, the essay highlights how the scholar recognizes that judges have "margins of decisionism, inevitably nourished by value judgments." It then asks what the perimeter of such discretion is, according to which canons it should be exercised, and how its judgment should be evaluated even in the scientific sphere. It concludes by emphasizing the relevance, in this regard, of attention to the impact of decisions, to the delicacy of certain hard cases and, in general, of considerations favourable to the option for moderation – while observing how, in recent works, Silvestri has decisively insisted on the duty to "render constitutional justice".</description>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://hdl.handle.net/10807/348997">
    <title>Do Markets Price New Geopolitical Exposure? Evidence from Cross-Border Acquisitions</title>
    <link>https://hdl.handle.net/10807/348997</link>
    <description>Titolo: Do Markets Price New Geopolitical Exposure? Evidence from Cross-Border Acquisitions
Autori: Rigamonti, Silvia; Signori, Andrea
Abstract: We examine whether geopolitical risk (GPR) is priced in the market reaction to cross-border M&amp;amp;A announcements. Using a sample of acquisitions announced between 2000 and 2024 by listed European bidders, we find that higher target-country geopolitical risk is associated with significantly lower acquirer abnormal returns, whereas bidder-country GPR is not statistically significant at announcement. The effect is economically meaningful: a one-standard-deviation increase in target-country GPR is associated with a 67-basis point lower acquirer abnormal return. These findings suggest that investors distinguish between the bidder’s pre-existing home-country exposure and the incremental geopolitical exposure implied by the target. Target-country GPR is therefore priced as a transaction-specific geographic risk that reduces expected synergies and raises required risk premia.</description>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

