<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>IRIS Tipologia:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://hdl.handle.net/10807/200" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>https://hdl.handle.net/10807/200</id>
  <updated>2026-04-22T09:50:01Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-22T09:50:01Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Spazi che formano. Il curriculum nascosto culturalmente situato nei contesti lavorativi</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://hdl.handle.net/10807/334178" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://hdl.handle.net/10807/334178</id>
    <updated>2026-04-22T08:16:22Z</updated>
    <published>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Titolo: Spazi che formano. Il curriculum nascosto culturalmente situato nei contesti lavorativi
Autori: Sofia Carboni</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Educare nel lavoro. Processi formativi e professionalizzazione nei contesti organizzativi</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://hdl.handle.net/10807/334177" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://hdl.handle.net/10807/334177</id>
    <updated>2026-04-22T08:08:46Z</updated>
    <published>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Titolo: Educare nel lavoro. Processi formativi e professionalizzazione nei contesti organizzativi
Autori: Sofia Carboni
Abstract: L’articolo esplora il “rovesciamento” in atto tra scuola e lavoro: la scuola, segnata da quella che Gert Biesta ha definito learnification, ha progressivamente ridotto la propria funzione educativa, mentre il lavoro contemporaneo si configura sempre più come spazio di riflessione, oricerca di senso e costruzione identitaria (soggettivazione, cfr. Biesta). In questo scenario il corporate learning può essere inteso come fenomeno pedagogico in cui pratiche riflessive e relazionali generano una “educazione dal basso”, capace di accogliere domande esistenziali e realizzative nei contesti organizzativi. Collocata entro la pedagogia del lavoro e ispirata al pensiero di G. Biesta, l’analisi propone una lettura critica del rapporto tra formazione e soggettivazione, riconoscendo nel &#xD;
lavoro contemporaneo un laboratorio culturale in cui l’educare si ridefinisce come pratica condivisa di significazione, responsabilità e &#xD;
crescita professionale.</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Editorial: Discourse, conversation and argumentation: theoretical perspectives and innovative empirical studies, volume IV</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://hdl.handle.net/10807/334176" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://hdl.handle.net/10807/334176</id>
    <updated>2026-04-22T07:26:51Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Titolo: Editorial: Discourse, conversation and argumentation: theoretical perspectives and innovative empirical studies, volume IV
Autori: Bova, Antonio; Arcidiacono, Francesco; Galimberti, Carlo; Haddouk, Lise
Abstract: Despite the central role of discourse, conversation, and argumentation in social life, psychological research still lacks a unified framework for understanding these communicative phenomena across contexts, methods, and theoretical traditions. Investigations of language use, dialogic interactions, and argumentative processes continue to develop within partially separate research communities, often limiting the possibility of a systematic interdisciplinary exchange.&#xD;
&#xD;
This fourth volume of the Research Topic “Discourse, conversation and argumentation: theoretical perspectives and innovative empirical studies” aims to further bridge this divide by bringing together innovative contributions that examine communicative practices from a broad psychological and socio-discursive perspective. The papers collected in this Research Topic explore the place of discourse within institutional, educational, interpersonal, media, and intercultural contexts, while also advancing a methodological reflection through corpora analyses, meta-analyses, comparative discourse analyses, stories completion, and functional linguistic approaches.&#xD;
&#xD;
Taken together, the contributions presented in this volume demonstrate the vitality and diversity of contemporary research on communication: they show how discourse and interaction are deeply implicated in the construction of identities, values, institutional positions, epistemic stances, and moral responsibilities. At the same time, they reveal how communicative practices are shaped by historical changes, cultural contexts, technological environments, and shifting social norms. By assembling studies that range from media representations and diplomatic discourses to educational dialogues, research writings, executive identities, and digital subtitlings, this volume offers a rich and multifaceted account of the psychological significance of language in use.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Balancing the carbon budget in maize using hairy vetch and black oat cover crops</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://hdl.handle.net/10807/334168" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <id>https://hdl.handle.net/10807/334168</id>
    <updated>2026-04-22T00:48:34Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Titolo: Balancing the carbon budget in maize using hairy vetch and black oat cover crops
Autori: Ben Hassine M.; Radicetti E.; Ardenti F.; Ferretti G.; Fiorini A.; Borgatti D.
Abstract: A two-year field experiment (2022-2024) was conducted in Ferrara (Italy) to evaluate the carbon (C) budget and agronomic performance of silage maize (Zea mays L.) cultivated following CCs under conservation agriculture. Three CCs [hairy vetch (HV), black oat (BO), and their 1:1 mixture (HV + BO)] were compared with a conventional maize (Conv). All CCs were terminated with a roller-crimper and maize was sown under no-till and unfertilized, while in Conv maize was sown in conventional tillage and received N fertilization. HV + BO mixture achieved the highest CC biomass (7.0 t DM m(-)2) and C input (2.80 t C ha(-)1), combining high biomass production with intermediate C:N ratio. Maize biomass was highest under Conv, followed by HV, HV + BO, while BO showed the lowest biomass values (18.1, 15.7, 14.4 and 10.8 t DM ha(-)1, respectively), mainly due to reduced soil N availability. Soil CO2 emissions peaked between 30 and 60 days after sowing and were influenced by soil temperature and moisture. HV and HV+BO exhibited higher cumulative CO2 fluxes than BO and Conv. The CO2 emission-to-yield ratio was low under Conv (0.82) similar to HV (0.91). The HV+BO mixture improved the input/output C ratio (0.297), suggesting a favorable balance between carbon inputs and outputs. CCs enhanced soil water retention and reduced soil compaction, particularly in HV plots. Integration of HV, either alone or in mixture with BO, under conservation agriculture emerged as a viable strategy to optimize C dynamics and enhance soil health for sustainable intensification of agroecosystems.</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

